Put up on 1st March 2022

HP Violate the integrity... of everything.

Excuse my graphic artistry skills, but imagine that as a cosmic substance in space, and you have what the HP Swirl marketing campaign was in 2008. I instantly realised that HP had built Matthews super laser and had fired it into space and they've hit something. I couldn't believe the stupidity, and then they've had the audacity to make a marketing campaign out of it. Like, "no one will know what it really is or what we've really done, ha ha ha". Well I did. Now if you google HP Swirl, it just comes up with pretty patterns on laptops, but that's what it was, and that's what they've done. No wonder (to me) it was like the world had gone crazy, upside down and inside out. So what did they hit? God? Heaven? A protective layer surrounding the Earth? What now gets in and out? Did they aim at anything or just shoot blindly into space to see what would happen? I doubt anyone from HP will come forward and come clean, but have they damaged the very fabric and integrity of the universe? What idiots.

I tried to get in touch with Matthew Mardling, but all I could find on the internet was an obscure reference to his death in 2003.

What to do?

We have to repair the damage. Firstly, HP need to come clean and tell us where this HP Swirl is so we can do something about it, if we can. Secondly, we need to be able to do space travel, which fortunately, I can help with.

With space travel, we're currently going nowhere fast. You have Richard Branson and Elon Musk propelling themselves up high using conventional methods then falling back to Earth. If they were to shoot themselves up too high they'd go into orbit and not come back. If they shot themselves up even higher, they'd drift enlessly into space, never to be seen again, so there's not much future in the current attempts. They might have a lot of money, but that doesn't mean they're very smart. From what we know, space is like a vacuum, so to propell yourself around in space, you need to be able to generate momentum internally. To do this, you need an internal momentum engine.

To build an internal momentum engine, you can use the forces of gyroscopic precession and rigidity. Now to explain what that is. Newton's 3rd Law, for every action there's an equal and opposite reaction, is not correct. On a spinning object, if you apply a force to it, the outcome of that force occurs 90 degrees in the direction of rotation. This is gyroscopic precession. We learnt and analysed this as part of our avionics technician theory for heading and reference systems, but mainly for helicopter autopilots and controls in the first instance. In a helicopter, if you want to go forward, the rotor head is tilted forward and you go forward, but to make that rotor head tilt forward, the hydraulics on the aircraft try to tilt the rotor head to the right (if the blades are spinning anti-clockwise), and the resultant forces of gyroscopic precession tilt the rotor head forward. 90 degrees in the direction of rotation.

I had a dilemma when I was a kid, I was trying to work about how a 100kg strong man, who could lift 500kg, why can't he lift himself up into the air? The answer is obvious, because his feet need to be on the ground to lift up. I would try and work out ways around this, but to no avail, it just wasn't possible. When I was doing my avionics training and we learnt about gyroscopic precession and rigidity, it was a eureka moment, that's how you can lift yourself up without having your feet on the ground. We had a break and I ran this by Matthew Mardling and a few others in our class, and we all agreed that it sounded right according to what we just learnt. We went back into the classroom and I said to the instructor, "If you had a mass spinning this way, and applied a force that way, it would go up, right?" The instructor looked at the arrows and said, yes, that's correct. I then said, "Well, that's anti-gravity." He looked a bit confused and just said "Huh?". I said not to worry about it and we moved on.

Afterwards, Matthew and I would talk about this. I come up with the idea of putting 4 gyroscopes on a board, one in each corner, that was sitting on bathroom scales to do a proof of concept. With the gyros spinning upwards and downwards, not round and round left to right, or right to left. You would then have an actuator apply a force to the gimbal ring (what the gyros spin within, you can have one in each axis) half way between up and down (which is 90 degrees), and if you applied 10kg of force from the actuator, it would get 10kg lighter according to the bathroom scales.

Gyroscopic rigidity is the spinning objects "strength" in that axis. A typical aircraft gyroscope spins at 20,000 rpm. If you apply too much force 90 degrees prior, and overcome the gyros strength, the gyro will topple. So design of weight and mass plus speed determines the gyro's strength and how much force it can take.

What I'm not sure about is, in the diagram, there are no Gimbal rings shown, it is a fixed axis the gyro is spinning on. So, do the gimbal rings need to be there? Then it could be free to move in that axis, but doesn't, because of gyrosopic precession - then rigidity matters. Or, does it not matter, can it simply be a fixed axis, and rigidity doesn't matter. If that was the case, you could make these very powerful and quite easy and cheaply. It would be either one or the other.

Three examples of gyroscopic precession are:

1. Riding a motorbike. When you lean in to a corner, you can do it one of two ways. You can lean the bike into the corner physically with your weight, or get the bike to lean you into the corner (this is the gyroscopic precession), by pushing the left handlebar to the right, and it will gently lean into a left hand bend, it is good to do if you want to throw the bike around quickly. With this, the bike handlebars are free to move in the axis you are pushing them in, so it doesn't help me with the rigidity option.

2. Sitting in a chair that spins around freely that doesn't have wheels on it, sticking your legs out and getting someone to spin you around. When you pull your legs in, you will spin around faster proportionate to the speed that you pull your legs in. Let your legs out and you will slow down, pull them back in again and you will speed up, and so on. This one seems to favour the no need for rigidity option, as the chair is sitting firmly on the floor in the axis you are moving your legs up and down in.

3. A Ballerina.

When talking to Matthew in 2002, and he was talking about his successes, I asked him if he built this. He did. He put the four gyros on a board and did as we had discussed as apprentices. Matthew being Matthew took the weight all the way down to zero, and then some more. He wasn't supposed to take it past zero though, it was only supposed to be a proof of concept. It had no direction, which Matthew probably wasn't thinking about or got over excited in the moment. Also, for a proof of a concept, you didn't need 4 gyro's, one would have done it. Anyway, he went past zero weight, it took off then exploded into pieces. He said he hadn't got back to it. What Matthew would've needed was directional gyros (gyros spinning left to right, or right to left, it doesn't matter) to have direction and momentum in those axis (forward, backwards, left, right) to steer it, not just go up and down. With the four gyros, he would have also needed good feedback and balancing circuits.

In a vacuum - such as space (if that's what space is), to have the ability to generate internal momentum means you would be able to go faster and faster. I do not see a limit to the speed that you would be able to travel at.

To have permission to leave Earth and travel in space, we must go in peace. We cannot go fitting laser beams and other weapons of destruction to spaceships, otherwise we won't be welcome and will be prohibited. It is time to evolve, the alternative is to dissolve, which we will if we continue our current path of conflict and control. It is important to remember that the potential of humanity is to love and be loved (opposite to fear and feared), to live in peace and have our freedom, it is not about galavanting around the universe. Do not violate. What is more important is life itself. The essence of life itself is like gyroscopic precession and rigidity, things that spin, that we cannot see. Here on Earth, humans are not top of the food chain, we get fed off and die, by things we cannot see, entities of energy, life of the highest order, they are certainly watching us. There is also a predator, so beware the predator. God is also real (which means so is the Devil), I met God on my third trip to South Africa in 2001. I understand why he doesn't show himself very often, it took me 17 years to recover from being pulled out of my body and stretched up into the clouds for him to say a few words to me. After coming back to earth, my head was like a blob of jelly. I would've recovered many times over, but it was just one thing after another. It was a 20 year battle. There is a woman that sits next to God, she was beautiful and oozed class. It was her that gave me hope to survive the predator and "life of the highest order". God himself was not as friendly as I would have expected, but what few words he said to me has meant so many different things over so many different situations. It still does.

As we understand more about the essence of life itself, we will understand more how not to lose it. The positive and negative energies. Scott's Law - "Life cannot destroy life". But it can be taken if you have an exposure or it can be relinquished, so be careful.

As for leaving Earth, I am not interested. I'm keeping my feet firmly planted on the ground. With TRIM, HP sold it in 2017 to Micro Focus after taking out some components of integrity and function, it is now called Content Manager and used by 80% of the Federal Government.

scott@orboftheuniverse.com.au

Put up on 12th April 2022

Put up on 21st April 2022

Put up on 24th April 2022